People v. Ratten
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.
After trial before the court without a jury (1) defendant Ratten was found guilty on one count of burglary, and (2) defendant Brown was found guilty on four counts of burglary. Defendant Ratten appeals from the judgment, while defendant Brown appeals from the judgments and also from the orders denying his motion for a new trial.
Viewing the evidence most favorable to the People (respondent) , the facts are these:
August 25, 1939, Mr. Schwartz, who lived at 2929 Eleventh Avenue, Los Angeles, retired at about 11:30 P. M. The following morning he discovered that his trousers had been removed from…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. FerdinandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- People v. ErnoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Gonzales v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- People v. McGannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- The People v. HinshawCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Pitchess v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Powell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- People v. WilkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Pacific Lighting Leasing Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- People v. TempleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.