Legal Opinion

Gottlieb v. Vaicek

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided December 16, 1975No. 74 C 2181PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

DECKER, District Judge.

This action was brought by the plaintiffs for the rescission of their interests in a limited partnership (Serendipity Partners) in accordance with Section 13, subd. B. of the Illinois Securities Law, Ill.Rev.Stat. ch. 121%, § 137.1, et seq. The complicated background of this litigation, which now includes a parallel suit in the state courts of California and *673a third party claim in the instant case, requires some explanation.

In November, 1972, Carl Vaicek, Jr., a citizen of California,1 and the defendant in this action, solicited the plaintiffs in the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Strawbridge v. CurtissSupreme Court of the United States · 1806
  2. Ferdinand Henry Schutten v. Shell Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  3. Robert Eikel and J. E. Davey v. States Marine Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  4. Mrs. Francies Morrison, Individually, and as Guardian of Glendon Morrison v. New Orleans Public Service Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  5. Potomac Electric Power Co. v. Babcock & Wilcox Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1972

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Acton Co., Inc. Of Massachusetts v. Bachman Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
  2. National Acceptance Co. of America v. WechslerDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1980
  3. Hagstrom v. BreutmanDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1983
  4. Delta Financial Corporation v. Paul D. Comanduras & AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
  5. Burger King Corp. v. American National Bank & Trust Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1988

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API