Legal Opinion
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Gonzalez De Castilla
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 8, 2002No. 01 CIV 3999(RWS)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendant Alejandro Duclaud Gonzalez de Castilla (“A.Duclaud”), Anteres Holdings Investment, Ltd. (“Antares”), Jose Antonio Duclaud Gonzalez de Castilla (“J.Duclaud”), Caribbean Legal Trust, Rodrigo Igartua Baranda (“Igartua”), and Banrise Limited B.V.I. (“Banrise”), have moved pursuant to Rule 56, Fed.R.Civ.P., for summary judgment dismissing the complaint of the plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) which has alleged insider trading violations of the securities laws in connection with a January 2000 tender offer for CompUSA, Inc. (“CompUSA”). The…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Huddleston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Williamson Oil Company, Inc. v. Philip Morris USACourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. EspuelasDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. RorechDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc. v. Montana Board of InvestmentsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- U.S. Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. AhmedDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2018
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.