Legal Opinion

Oliver v. United Mortgage Company

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided June 26, 1967No. 4011PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MYERS, Associate Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment on a trial finding denying recovery to a borrower (appellant) seeking the return of allegedly usurious interest charged by ap-pellee in violation of the “Loan Shark Law” of the District of Columbia. 1

Appellant came to appellee’s office after having read appellee’s advertisement for “CASH — 1st, 2nd, 3rd Trusts Arranged” to consult about securing a loan on his improved property in the District of Columbia in the amount of $2,100 for six months. There was already a first deed of trust on the property. As a result, a second deed of trust…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Grant v. Phœnix Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Hartman v. LubarCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
  3. District of Columbia v. Hamilton Nat. Bank of WashingtonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1950
  4. James W. Beatty v. Franklin Investment Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963
  5. McDonald v. StoneDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1952

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Family Federal Savings & Loan v. Davis (In Re Davis)District Court, District of Columbia · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API