Oliver v. United Mortgage Company
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
MYERS, Associate Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment on a trial finding denying recovery to a borrower (appellant) seeking the return of allegedly usurious interest charged by ap-pellee in violation of the “Loan Shark Law” of the District of Columbia. 1
Appellant came to appellee’s office after having read appellee’s advertisement for “CASH — 1st, 2nd, 3rd Trusts Arranged” to consult about securing a loan on his improved property in the District of Columbia in the amount of $2,100 for six months. There was already a first deed of trust on the property. As a result, a second deed of trust…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Grant v. Phœnix Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Hartman v. LubarCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
- District of Columbia v. Hamilton Nat. Bank of WashingtonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1950
- James W. Beatty v. Franklin Investment Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963
- McDonald v. StoneDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1952
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Family Federal Savings & Loan v. Davis (In Re Davis)District Court, District of Columbia · 1994