Hamaas v. State
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Sanders, Chief Judge:
Appellants Dibble and Dial are lawyers appointed by the circuit court to represent Earl T. Hamaas in several civil actions which he brought against the State, complaining of circumstances attendant to his incarceration in the state penitentiary. The lawyers sought to be relieved of the appointment, contending that in requiring them to represent Hamaas without compensation, the court deprives them of constitutional rights pursuant to the 14th and 5th Amendments of the United States Constitution. The judge below agreed Hamaas was not entitled to appointed counsel, but…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Baxter v. PalmigianoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ex Parte DibbleCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1983