Spooner v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtGuerry, J.
It appears that the jury selected and sworn in the present case in the trial court were, at the beginning of their deliberations, placed in charge of two bailiffs, J. A. Yinson and J. B. Arnett. Arnett had been a witness for the State. The defendant was found guilty, and on the motion for new trial it was contended that certain conduct of Arnett and certain illegal communications with the jury were such as to vitiate the verdict and require a new trial. After careful consideration, we are of the opinion that the judge committed error in denying this motion. At the hearing of the motion the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gholston v. GholstonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1860
- Sullivan v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Obear v. GraySupreme Court of Georgia · 1881
- Buchanan v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1882
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
- Reaves v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
- Maltbie v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Lucas v. SwanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1933