Paine v. Young
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from the Baltimore City Court. The case is stated in the opinion of the Court. Exception. — At the trial, the plaintiff offered the two following prayers: 1. That if the jury find from all the evidence, that a hill of sale was made by James Young to John Young, the plaintiff, in consideration of the money named in the said bill of sale, that the goods and chattels levied upon and taken by the sheriff by the fi. fa. issued against James Young, had been sold to the…
Read the full summary
Appeal from the Baltimore City Court. The case is stated in the opinion of the Court. Exception. — At the trial, the plaintiff offered the two following prayers: 1. That if the jury find from all the evidence, that a hill of sale was made by James Young to John Young, the plaintiff, in consideration of the money named in the said bill of sale, that the goods and chattels levied upon and taken by the sheriff by the fi. fa. issued against James Young, had been sold to the plaintiff and conveyed by the said bill of sale, then the said goods and chattels were wrongfully levied upon and taken by…
1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.
James Young, Jr., conveyed to the appellee, the stock of carriages and wagons, finished and unfinished; and also the materials then being in his carriage factory.
The property was left in the possession of Young the bargainor, and the unfinished carriages were subsequently finished by him. Whether all the materials used in completing the carriages were the materials included in the bill of sale, or were in part bought by Young, the bargainor, after the date of the bill of sale, the evidence in the record is somewhat conflicting. But this question in the view we take of the case is quite…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hamilton v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1855
3Cited by1 opinion
- Barber v. ThomasSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903