Legal Opinion

Carpenter v. Koskinen

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 29, 2017No. 16-1036-cvUnpublished

1Opinion of the Court

16‐1036‐cv Carpenter v. Koskinen UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007 IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURTʹS LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION ʺSUMMARY ORDERʺ). A PARTY CITING A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. JacobsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  2. United States v. GaniasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
  3. United States v. GaniasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
  4. United States v. CarpenterDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API