Legal Opinion
State v. Marsh
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 3, 1975PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLoiselle, J.
The defendant, Charles Marsh, after a jury trial, was found guilty of four counts of sale of a narcotic drug in violation of § 19-480 (a) of the General Statutes. He has appealed from the judg ment. Of the assignments of error made only two are briefed. All other claims are considered to have been abandoned. State v. Lally, 167 Conn. 601, 605, 356 A.2d 897; State v. Brown, 163 Conn. 52, 55, 301 A.2d 547.
The first assignment of error is that the court failed to permit defense counsel to ask questions designed to determine the existence of bias or prejudice. Specifically, the defendant, who is…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Moore v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Giles v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Ham v. South CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Miller v. PateSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- State v. ReedSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- State v. PollittSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Lar-Rob Bus Corp. v. Town of FairfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.