Legal Opinion
Richard Anthony Tucker v. William D. Catoe, Director, South Carolina Department of Corrections Charles M. Condon, Attorney General, State of South Carolina, Richard Anthony Tucker v. William D. Catoe, Director, South Carolina Department of Corrections Charles M. Condon, Attorney General, State of South Carolina
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided June 13, 2000No. 99-14Published
1Opinion of the Court
221 F.3d 600 (4th Cir. 2000)
RICHARD ANTHONY TUCKER, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
WILLIAM D. CATOE, Director, South Carolina Department of Corrections; CHARLES M. CONDON, Attorney General, State of South Carolina, Respondents-Appellees.
RICHARD ANTHONY TUCKER, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
WILLIAM D. CATOE, Director, South Carolina Department of Corrections; CHARLES M. CONDON, Attorney General, State of South Carolina, Respondents-Appellees.
No. 99-14, No. 99-15 (CA-98-681-0-8BD)
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Argued: April 4, 2000
Decided: June 13, 2000
Appeals from the United States…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Lockhart v. FretwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Evitts v. LuceySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.