Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Forrest

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 17, 1990Published

1DissentMurphy, P. J.

lant was denied a fair trial by the combined effect of the egregious Rosario violation and the improper admission of the nontestifying codefendant’s statement. These errors are sufficient to warrant reversal without reaching, in the interest of justice, the additional error, to which no objection was made, of submitting the elements of the crime to the jury in written form. (See, People v Gonzalez, 157 AD2d 625 [1st Dept 1990].)

The Rosario violation alone warrants reversal. While the *215complaining witness was hospitalized and incapacitated by multiple gunshot wounds, he was interviewed by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cruz v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. People v. MartinezNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. People v. CruzNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. People v. RodriguezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  5. People v. GonzalezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API