Legal Opinion

State v. Potter

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 26, 1990No. C87-04-32322; CA A50014PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNewman, J.

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for unauthorized use of a motor vehicle. ORS 164.135. He had pled guilty. At sentencing, the state requested that defendant pay restitution for the cost of repairing a dent that the car suffered during the period of the theft. The court suspended imposition of sentence and imposed restitution as a condition of probation. We affirm the conviction but vacate that condition of probation and remand for resentencing.

Defendant asserts that the court erred, because the state failed to show that the damage resulted from defendant’s criminal activity. ORS…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. DillonOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. State v. LefthandbullOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State v. HazlittCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  4. State v. SellersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. GuerreroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  2. State v. MothershedCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  3. State v. IvoryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  4. State v. BonnieCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  5. State v. StoneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API