Legal Opinion

First National Bank v. Gow

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1910PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Motion to limit examination of a witness in supplementary proceedings.

1Opinion of the CourtWhitney, J.

The pendency of a suit by the judgment debtor against this witness upon the alleged cause of action concerning which his testimony is sought in these supplementary proceedings is no bar to the examination. Even if the judgment creditor were suing him these proceedings could be used for the purpose of an examination before trial, as the law is settled in this department at least. The con*548trary of the latter proposition was held by Mr. Justice Barrett in 1885, in Schloss v. Wallach, 16 Abb. N. C. 319n. but he was reversed by the General Term (38 Hun, 638), and an appeal to the Court of Appeals…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lathrop v. . ClappNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
  2. Caldwell v. GlazierAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  3. Lowther v. LowtherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. First National Bank v. Gow.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API