Charles Ben Howell, and Ken E. MacKey v. The Supreme Court of Texas
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
REAVLEY, Circuit Judge:
Appellant Charles Ben Howell brought this § 1983 action seeking declaratory and injunctive relief. The district court concluded that Howell had already litigated his claims in state court and dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. The district court assessed attorneys’ fees and expenses against Howell and his attorney as Rule 11 sanctions.
In this appeal, Howell asserts that the district court erred in concluding that it did not have jurisdiction under the Rook-er-Feldman doctrine. Alternatively, Howell argues that the court should have exercised jurisdiction because the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Brotherhood of Locomotive EngineersSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Patricia Thomas v. Capital Security Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Bianchi v. RylaarsdamCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- James M. Scott, Jr. v. Robert C. FlowersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- Geoffrey N. Fieger v. John D. Ferry, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Gilbert v. FerryDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2003
- Jackson v. Jackson CountyDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1995
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.