Legal Opinion

West v. G.D. Searle & Co.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 11, 1994No. 93-685PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Robert H. Dudley, Justice.

From 1971 to 1983, Gari West took Ovulen-28, a prescription drug indicated for oral contraception. The drug was manufactured and distributed by defendant Searle. In December of 1983, Gari West was diagnosed as having a hepatic adenoma, a benign liver tumor, which caused damage and extensive suffering. Hepatic adenomas may develop for no known reason, but such adenomas are often known to be caused by taking oral contraceptive^. Gari West and her husband, Larry West, sued Searle and alleged that Ovulen-28 was defectively designed and manufactured, that Searle was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. West v. Searle & Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  2. Carton v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  3. Forrest City MacHine Works, Inc. v. LyonsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  4. Hubbard v. Shores Group, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  5. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Blastech, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1993

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Smith v. Sidney Moncrief Pontiac, Buick, GMC Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  2. MARTIN BY MARTIN v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Orr v. HudsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2010
  4. Stracener v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2003
  5. Technology Partners, Inc. v. Regions BankCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2006

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API