Legal Opinion

Jones v. Brazile

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 28, 1882No. 2372, R. Book No. 4, p. 265PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Brown County.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Willson, J.

§ 299. In suit upon a contract, quantum meruit not recoverable. Suit was brought on an account due for *122services “as per contract.” The evidence proved the services rendered as claimed, but proved at the same time that the services were performed without any contract or understanding between the parties as to the amount of pay plaintiff was to receive. In other words, plaintiff sued upon a specific contract, and, failing to pi’ove such contract, has recovered upon a quantum meruit. This is error. The plaintiff must recover, if at all, upon the cause of action declared…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hall v. JacksonTexas Supreme Court · 1848
  2. Gammage v. AlexanderTexas Supreme Court · 1855
  3. Denison v. LeagueTexas Supreme Court · 1856
  4. Lemmon v. HanleyTexas Supreme Court · 1866
  5. Chrisman v. MillerTexas Supreme Court · 1855

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. ChessmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. People v. ChessmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Randolph v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API