Legal Opinion

Chrisman v. Miller

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1855PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Error from Washington.

1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, J.

A preliminary question is presented, whether, in a case like the present, where service has been by publication, and the judgment rendered on an ex parte hearing, the defendants in the judgment are entitled to prosecute a writ of error, where the Statute gives another remedy by a petition of review. (Hart. Dig. Art. 783.) We are of opinion that it was not the intention of the Statute to take away the right to prosecute a writ of error from the judgment; but to give an additional remedy in such cases; and that the remedies are concurrent. The right to prosecute a writ of error from a judgment…

2Cited by20 opinions

  1. Galveston, H. & S. A. R. R. Co. v. Pfeuffer & IrelandTexas Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Kruegel v. CobbCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910
  3. Weaver v. VandervanterTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. VienoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1894
  5. Baldridge v. ScottTexas Supreme Court · 1877

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API