Chrisman v. Miller
Texas Supreme Court
Error from Washington.
1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, J.
A preliminary question is presented, whether, in a case like the present, where service has been by publication, and the judgment rendered on an ex parte hearing, the defendants in the judgment are entitled to prosecute a writ of error, where the Statute gives another remedy by a petition of review. (Hart. Dig. Art. 783.) We are of opinion that it was not the intention of the Statute to take away the right to prosecute a writ of error from the judgment; but to give an additional remedy in such cases; and that the remedies are concurrent. The right to prosecute a writ of error from a judgment…
2Cited by20 opinions
- Galveston, H. & S. A. R. R. Co. v. Pfeuffer & IrelandTexas Supreme Court · 1881
- Kruegel v. CobbCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910
- Weaver v. VandervanterTexas Supreme Court · 1892
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. VienoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1894
- Baldridge v. ScottTexas Supreme Court · 1877
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.