Legal Opinion

James v. Logee

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided March 18, 1986No. Docket 81490PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff appeals as of right from a November 4, 1984, order of accelerated judgment granted under GCR 1963, 116.1(5), now MCR 2.116(C)(7). The question presented on appeal is whether actions for tortious interference with a contract are governed by the three-year period of limitation as provided under MCL 600.5805(8); MSA 27A.5805(8) or by the six-year period of limitation as provided under MCL 600.5813; MSA 27A.5813. We hold that the applicable limitation period is three years and we affirm the order of accelerated judgment entered in this case.

According to the complaint, plaintiff entered…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lothian v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Trepel v. Pontiac Osteopathic HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Mair v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Wilkerson v. CarloMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Joba Const. Co., Inc. v. Burns & Roe, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Dxs, Inc., a Michigan Corporation, F/k/a Flint X-Ray, Inc. v. Siemens Medical Systems, Inc., a Foreign CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  2. Blazer Foods, Inc v. Restaurant Properties, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. National Sand, Inc v. Nagel Construction, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Bliss Clearing Niagara, Inc. v. Midwest Brake Bond Co.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2003
  5. Wausau Underwriters Insurance Company v. Vulcan Development, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API