Martingale LLC Bridge the Gap, Inc. v. City of Louisville Waterfront Development Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GWIN, District Judge.
In this case, Martingale, LLC (“Martingale”) and Bridge the Gap, Inc. (“Bridge the Gap”) appeal the district court’s ruling permitting the City of Louisville (“City”) and the Waterfront Development Corporation to condemn a structure known as the Big Four Bridge. The Big Four Bridge connects Jeffersonville, Indiana with Louisville, Kentucky. The City and the Waterfront Development Corporation wish to use the bridge as part of a public park, but Martingale and Bridge the Gap contend that the City has no legal power to condemn the bridge.
For the following reasons, the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Brotherhood of Locomotive EngineersSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Chick Kam Choo v. Exxon Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Amsouth Bank (03-5517) First Tennessee Bank (03-5521) v. George DaleCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- Zuzanna Juris v. Inamed CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012
- Gooch v. Life Investors Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Hanover Am. Ins. Co. v. Tattooed MillionaireCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2022
- Snap-On Business Solutions Inc. v. O'Neil & Associates, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2010
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.