Legal Opinion

Allingham v. Long-Bell Lumber Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1925No. 19403. Department OnePublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAskren, J.

— Plaintiff brought this action to recover for personal injuries. After verdict by tbe jury in plaintiff’s favor, tbe court entered judgment for defendant notwithstanding the verdict, and plaintiff appeals.

The facts follow: Appellant, desiring to secure work with respondent corporation, went to what he describes as “The Long-Bell hotel or boarding house” of respondent, and paid for his board and bed for two nights. He was sent to the bunkhouse and assigned to bed known as No. 11. The bunkhouse of respondent is an oblong building, divided into two parts, the north side of which is known as…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lydon v. Exchange National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Merwin v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fiskaa v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Tusnadi v. FrodleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1973
  3. Reeve v. ArnoldoWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Allingham v. Long-Bell Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Barton v. Spokane CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API