Legal Opinion

Allingham v. Long-Bell Lumber Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 12, 1927No. 20576. Department OnePublished

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

This is a personal injury case. Upon the trial of it to a jury, there was a verdict for the plaintiff in the sum of $3,500. The defendant, Long-Bell Lumber Company, filed a motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict and, at the same time, a motion for a new trial, on the grounds of excessive damages appearing to have been awarded under the influence of passion and prejudice and insufficiency of the evidence to justify the verdict and that it is against the law. The trial court granted the motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and entered a judgment dismissing the action.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Allingham v. Long-Bell Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API