Burak v. Burak
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
Natasha Burak v. Mark Burak, et al., No. 97, September Term 2016. Opinion by Hotten, J. FAMILY LAW — CUSTODY — THIRD-PARTIES — PERMISSIVE INTERVENTION The Court of Appeals held that there is no procedural bar prohibiting a third-party from seeking to intervene in a custody dispute between parents because Maryland Rule 2-214 allows any person to intervene in an action “when the person’s claim or defense has a question of law or fact in common with the action.” Maryland Rule 2-214(b)(1). The Court also held that because a third-party may only obtain custody of a child over the child’s…
2Cases cited68 opinions
- Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Parham v. J. R.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Moore v. AsenteKentucky Supreme Court · 2003
- Ex Parte TerrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.