Legal Opinion
Union Sulphur Co. v. Freeport Texas Co.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided November 15, 1915No. 336PublishedCited by 1 opinion
In Equity. Bill by tlie Union Sulphur Company against the Free-port Texas Company and the Freeport Sulphur Company, which latter defendant was not served. On motion for separate hearing of the defense of nonliability of the Freeport Texas Company ior the acts of the Freeport Sulphur Company.
1Opinion of the Court
BRADFORD, District Judge.
The bill was filed by the Union Sulphur Company againsU’the Freeport Texas Company, a corporation of Delaware, and the Freeport Sulphur Company, a corporation of Texas; but the last named company is not before the *192court, not having been served with process and not having appeared. The seventh paragraph of the bill states:
“That the said Freeport Texas Company at the time of the commission, of the acts hereinafter complained of was controlling and is now controlling all of the acts and all of the property of the Freeport Sulphur Company and was and is now operating and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Alexander v. Fidelity Trust Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1914
- Sanitary Street Flushing Mach. Co. v. Studebaker Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1915
- Alexander v. Fidelity Trust Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1914
3Cited by1 opinion
- Goodrich Zinc Corporation v. CarlinDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1925