Legal Opinion

Sanitary Street Flushing Mach. Co. v. Studebaker Corp.

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided August 27, 1915No. 313PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In Equity. Suit by the Sanitary Street Flushing Machine Company against the Studebaker Corporation.

1Opinion of the Court

ORR, District judge

(specially presiding). In this patent case, upon application by defendant, under equity rule 29 (198 Fed. xxvi, 115 C. C. A. xxvi), the court—

“ordered that, before the trial of the principal cause, the question raised by paragraphs 7 and 8 of defendant’s answer, as to whether the issues and parties herein and the same as in a cause heretofore finally heard a.nd determined in tlie United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, and affirmed by the United Slates Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, be separately heard and disposed of, and that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kessler v. EldredSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Hubbell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. St. Louis Union Trust Co. v. Studebaker Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1914

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Keown v. HughesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1920
  2. Woburn Degreasing Co. v. Spencer Kellogg & SonsDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1941
  3. Union Sulphur Co. v. Freeport Texas Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API