Heide v. Hunter Hamilton Ltd. Partnership
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
FEIKENS, District Judge.
Introduction
Plaintiff Uta Heide (“Heide”) moves for summary judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(a). Plaintiff filed this case to enforce the terms of a promissory note executed by defendant Hunter Hamilton Limited Partnership (“Hunter Hamilton”) through its general partners, defendant Spyros St. Kontos (“Kontos”) and defendant J.D.H. Management, Inc. II (“J.D.H.”). All defendants have admitted execution of the promissory note on May 10, 1991 in answer to the Complaint.
Defendant Kontos executed a guaranty of payment of the promissory note. Plaintiff…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gladwin State Bank v. DowMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
- Union Guardian Trust Co. v. CrawfordMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
- Gardner v. MattesonMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
- Smith v. StoddardMichigan Supreme Court · 1862
- Mathews v. TrippMichigan Supreme Court · 1938