Legal Opinion

Heide v. Hunter Hamilton Ltd. Partnership

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided June 25, 1993No. 92-CV-77273Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

FEIKENS, District Judge.

Introduction

Plaintiff Uta Heide (“Heide”) moves for summary judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(a). Plaintiff filed this case to enforce the terms of a promissory note executed by defendant Hunter Hamilton Limited Partnership (“Hunter Hamilton”) through its general partners, defendant Spyros St. Kontos (“Kontos”) and defendant J.D.H. Management, Inc. II (“J.D.H.”). All defendants have admitted execution of the promissory note on May 10, 1991 in answer to the Complaint.

Defendant Kontos executed a guaranty of payment of the promissory note. Plaintiff…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gladwin State Bank v. DowMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Union Guardian Trust Co. v. CrawfordMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Gardner v. MattesonMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Smith v. StoddardMichigan Supreme Court · 1862
  5. Mathews v. TrippMichigan Supreme Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API