Gardner v. Matteson
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Van Burén. Bepleyin. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated.
1Opinion of the CourtMarston, J.
On the 12th day of November, 1875, plaintiff in error executed and delivered to defendant in error a chattel mortgage upon a span of horses and other personal property to secure the payment of four hundred and forty-nine dollars according to two promissory notes. These notes not having been paid, as claimed by the mortgagee, he took possession of the mortgaged property, whereupon the mortgagor brought this action — replevin— to recover possession of the property taken. Upon the trial, Gardner, who was plaintiff below, introduced evidence tending to prove title to the property taken, its…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Tannahill v. TuttleMichigan Supreme Court · 1854
- Smith v. StoddardMichigan Supreme Court · 1862
3Cited by12 opinions
- Gladwin State Bank v. DowMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
- Union Guardian Trust Co. v. CrawfordMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
- Continental National Bank of Chicago v. FlemingMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
- Gray v. H. M. Loud & Sons Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1901
- Hogan v. Hester Investment Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1932
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.