PJ Acquisition Corp. v. Skoglund
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1DissentYetka, Justice
I respectfully dissent. I do so because I believe that the lead opinion is fundamentally anchored in Miller v. Miller, 301 Minn. 207, 222 N.W.2d 71 (1974), which was decided before significant legislative changes to the Minnesota Business Corporation Act. The opinion fails to recognize that, in 1981 and 1983, the legislature totally overhauled corporation law in Minnesota with the intent and effect of precluding actions of the sort undertaken in this ease by the respondents. While the law previously may have allowed the business community much latitude in dealings among its members, the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Grondahl v. BulluckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Clarence v. Watson v. Woodrow C. ButtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
- Schreiber v. BryanCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1978
- Schmidt v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.