Legal Opinion

B. Siegel Co. v. Wayne Circuit Judge

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1914No. Calendar No. 26,446PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Mandamus by the B. Siegel Company against George P. Codd, one of the circuit judges for the county of Wayne, to compel respondent to vacate an order granting a preliminary injunction in a suit instituted against relator as defendant.

1Opinion of the CourtSteere, J.

This is an application for a writ of mandamus to compel the vacation by respondent of a preliminary injunction issued in a suit now pending *147in the Wayne county circuit court in chancery, entitled Parker Estate Co., Limited, Complainant, v. B. Siegel Co., Defendant, brought for the purpose of permanently restraining relator by injunction from cutting certain proposed openings through the southerly wall of the so-called “Parker Block,” located on lot 40, section 8, of the governor and judges’ plan of the city of Detroit, at the southwest corner of State street and Woodward avenue in said city.

Th…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ionia, Eaton & Barry Farmers' Mutual Fire Insurance v. DavisMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Taylor v. DeveauxMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Ittner v. St. Louis Exposition & Music Hall Ass'nSupreme Court of Missouri · 1888
  4. Titus v. Chippewa Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Michigan Coalition of State Employee Unions v. Civil Service CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Schroeder v. Terra Energy, Ltd.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Burgess v. Jackson Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  4. City of Ypsilanti v. Appalachian InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1982
  5. In Re LooseMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API