Legal Opinion

Peeples v. Tygart

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 6, 1909No. 1698PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Certiorari, from Berrien superior court — Judge Mitchell. January 15, 1909.

1Opinion of the CourtHill, C. J.

1. The answer of the magistrate to the writ of certiorari was as follows: “After reading over the evidence and the rulings as set forth in the within petition for certiorari, answer that, to the best of my recollection, the evidence and rulings of the court as set forth in said petition are correct.” Held: (a) This was a substantial verification of all the statements of fact set out in the petition for certiorari. (6) If the defendant in certiorari was dissatisfied with the answer of the magistrate, he should have filed exceptions thereto as provided by the Civil Code, §4647; Davis v. Rhodes,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Davis v. RhodesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  2. Harris v. DalySupreme Court of Georgia · 1904

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sisk v. Anderson Phosphate & Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
  2. Lynn v. CrappsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
  3. Easterling & Alexander v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
  4. Macris v. TsipoursesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API