Macris v. Tsipourses
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.
1. Exceptions to the answer of the trial judge in a certiorari case must specify the defects. “They must be so definite, apt, and certain that the magistrate may be able to understand the exact nature of the deficiency that he is called upon to supply.” Landrum v. Moss, 1 Ga. App. 216 (5) (57 S. E. 965). Some of the exceptions to the answer in this case were devoted exclusively to argument, or to a criticism of the judge’s motives and conduct in failing to answer differently. None of them wore sufficiently definite in pointing out the deficiencies which the petitioner in certiorari sought to…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Landrum v. MossCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Bugg v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
- Ford v. ToomerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Colbert v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Royston v. RoystonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1859
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Cunningham v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928