Legal Opinion

Harter v. Ozark-Kenworth, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 13, 1995No. WD 49772PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRECKENRIDGE, Presiding Judge.

James T. Harter, Jr., filed a negligence action against Ozark-Kenworth, Inc. (“Ozark-Kenworth”), after he was allegedly injured on the company’s premises. The trial court entered a summary judgment in favor of Ozark-Kenworth, and Mr. Harter now appeals, claiming that Ozark-Kenworth breached its duty of care by failing to provide the proper equipment.

The judgment is reversed and remanded.

In reviewing the trial court’s order of summary judgment, the record is considered in the light most favorable to the party against whom judgment was entered, affording that party…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. Kennedy v. DixonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
  3. Young v. PaxtonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  4. Ernst v. Ford Motor Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Scott v. ThorntonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Smith v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1997
  2. Reis v. Peabody Coal Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. Stone v. Crown Diversified Industries Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. Dillard v. Shaughnessy, Fickel & Scott Architects, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Skinner v. Ogallala Public School District No. 1Nebraska Supreme Court · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API