Bennett v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MORRISON, Judge.
The offense is burglary; both appellants received an eight year sentence.
Their common ground of error No. 3 is that the court erred in admitting evidence of an extraneous offense.
Officer Hudson, when testifying about his investigation of the burglary of the cafe owned by the injured party named in the indictment, stated that he first went to a nearby filling station. Appellants immediately objected and asked that the jury be retired. This being done, Mr. Bynum, owner of the nearby filling station was called and testified that on the day of the cafe burglary, a tire tool…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hafti v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1967
- Carroll v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1963
- Garcia v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1957
- Coston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1954
- Miller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1940
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Hinkle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969
- Owens v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969
- Bennett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969
- Franklin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Shaw v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.