Legal Opinion

Franklin v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided December 6, 1972No. 45323PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DALLY, Commissioner.

The conviction is for robbery by assault; the punishment, one hundred years imprisonment.

By several grounds of error the appellant urges that this case should be reversed because the State was permitted to introduce evidence of an extraneous offense. We agree. The extraneous offense was not shown to be admissible under any of the exceptions to the general rule that extraneous offenses are not admissible.

The appellant was indicted in this case for the robbery of James Gregory, an attendant at the DeWees Eneo Service Station in Big Spring.

The State’s first witness,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Albrecht v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
  2. Ford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
  3. Brazzell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
  4. Rodriguez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
  5. Enriquez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1968

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Boutwell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  2. Cameron v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
  3. Alvarez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
  4. Boykin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
  5. James v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API