Legal Opinion
State v. Spencer
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided April 30, 1985No. C8-84-1387PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PARKER, Judge.
This is an appeal from a conviction of intrafamilial sexual abuse in the first degree. Appellant Edwin Spencer claims his conviction should be reversed because certain evidence was improperly admitted, he was denied due process, and he was denied effective assistance of counsel. We affirm.
FACTS
Spencer was charged with intrafamilial sexual abuse in the first and second degrees. The complainant, his 13-year-old daughter (A.S.), alleged he had sexual intercourse with her.
At trial A.S. testified that for nearly three months Spencer frequently entered her bedroom, touched her…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. TureSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Ture v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- State v. WoffordSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
- State v. HeidelbergerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
3Cited by11 opinions
- Charlson v. CharlsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. ShampCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
- State v. FolleyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Patten v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Seelye v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.