Legal Opinion

Oglesby v. McCoy

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 19, 1979No. 783SC855PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARLTON, Judge.

The primary question for determination is whether the legislature, in enacting G.S. 113-202(j) in 1967, violated the constitutional prohibition of statutes impairing the obligation of contracts. We hold that it did not.

Contracts to which a state is a party are within the constitutional prohibition against the impairment of the obligation of contracts. An act of a legislature may be an obligation of the state within the constitutional prohibition, and whatever rights are created by such act a subsequent legislature cannot impair. It is a well established principle that a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Geyer v. LietzanIndiana Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Oglesby v. AdamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lattimore v. Fisher's Food Shoppe, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  2. In Re the Protest of Mason Ex Rel. Proposed Lease of HuberCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  3. Lattimore v. Fisher's Food Shoppe, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  4. Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports2000
  5. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API