Oglesby v. McCoy
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
CARLTON, Judge.
The primary question for determination is whether the legislature, in enacting G.S. 113-202(j) in 1967, violated the constitutional prohibition of statutes impairing the obligation of contracts. We hold that it did not.
Contracts to which a state is a party are within the constitutional prohibition against the impairment of the obligation of contracts. An act of a legislature may be an obligation of the state within the constitutional prohibition, and whatever rights are created by such act a subsequent legislature cannot impair. It is a well established principle that a…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Geyer v. LietzanIndiana Supreme Court · 1952
- Oglesby v. AdamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lattimore v. Fisher's Food Shoppe, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- In Re the Protest of Mason Ex Rel. Proposed Lease of HuberCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Lattimore v. Fisher's Food Shoppe, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports2000
- Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports2000