Legal Opinion

Oglesby v. Adams

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 12, 1966No. 113PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPless, J.

“Contracts to which a State is a party are within the constitutional prohibition against the impairment of the obligation of contracts. An act of a legislature may be an obligation of the State within the constitutional prohibition, and whatever rights are created by such act a subsequent legislature cannot impair. It is a well established principle that a contract to which a State, or a subdivision thereof, is a party is as much within the constitutional prohibition of statutes impairing the obligation of contracts as a contract between individuals, particularly with respect to contracts…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pinkham v. . MercerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  2. State Ex Rel. Blount v. SpencerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bailey v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  2. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  3. Oglesby v. McCoyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  4. Bolick v. County of CaldwellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  5. Bailey v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API