Cantone v. Superintendent, Green Haven Correctional Facility
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
WHITMAN KNAPP, District Judge.
Petitioner, acting pro se,1 has brought this action for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. His central claim is that the State in violation of Brady v. Maryland (1963) 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 and Mooney v. Holohan (1935) 294 U.S. 103, 55 S.Ct. 340, 79 L.Ed. 791 failed to furnish him prior to or during his trial in the Supreme Court, Nassau County, with certain potentially exculpatory material which had been requested by his counsel. For the reasons detailed below, we grant the petition.2
*441INTRODUCTION
Petitioner…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Mooney v. HolohanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- People v. BaumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- People v. CantoneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Angelo Cantone v. Superintendent, New York Correctional Facility at Green Haven, and Robert Abrams, Attorney General of the State of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985