Legal Opinion

Raphael v. State

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 2000No. S-8645PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FABE, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

The prosecutor in Wilfred Raphael’s assault and kidnapping trial told the trial judge at an ex parte hearing that the complaining witness, I.W., was likely to recant, was intoxicated, and should be incarcerated until she testified. Without first notifying Raphael or his attorney of the prosecutor’s claims, the trial judge granted the prosecutor’s request, jailing I.W. and placing her children in protective custody. Raphael claims that the trial court denied his right to due process because of the potentially coercive effect of I.W.’s treatment on her…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Adams v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Skinner v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Young v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Johnson v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
  5. State v. SamuelWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API