Baugh v. State

The only question presented on this appeal is the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict of the jury finding the appellant guilty, ■ under the second and third counts of an indictment, of possessing and selling intoxicating liquor.

It appears from the record that, on Sunday, March 20, 1927, three young men, neighbors of appellant, went to his home in an automobile owned by the father of one of the boys, to get “something to drink.” One of the boys testified, as his testimony is set forth in appellant’s brief: “We went to the home of Thaddeus Baugh

to get some wine; we got wine; I do…