Legal Opinion

O'Connor v. Larson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 20, 1980PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously modified and, as modified, affirmed, without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: In this personal injury action, the complaint alleges that a dog owned by defendant attacked *735and injured the infant plaintiff. While Special Term directed plaintiffs to supply defendant with the names and addresses of persons who witnessed the incident, it denied defendant’s request for the names and addresses of witnesses to the alleged prior vicious propensities exhibited by the dog, holding that this information was "material prepared for litigation” (CPLR 3101, subd [d]).…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Zellman v. Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
  2. Zayas v. MoralesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
  3. Foremost Insurance v. 3 Grace Avenue, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bombard v. County of AlbanyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  2. Gechoff v. Our Lady of Victory HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  3. Harris v. KasperakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  4. Humiston v. Rochester Institute of TechnologyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  5. Reisch v. J & L Holding Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API