Legal Opinion

Harris v. Kasperak

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 26, 1991PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion granted and complaint dismissed. Memorandum: In this action commenced by plaintiffs to recover for personal injuries sustained by the infant plaintiff when defendant’s Irish Setter dog allegedly bit her about her face, defendant moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Supreme Court denied his motion. We reverse.

An owner of a domestic animal is not liable for injuries caused by the animal unless he knows or should have known of its vicious propensities (see, Muller v McKesson, 73 NY 195; DeVaul v Carvigo Inc., 138 AD2d…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Muller v. . McKessonNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  3. Catucci v. MarchiNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. DeVaul v. Carvigo Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  5. Russell v. LepreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Arcara v. WhytasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. Smith v. FarnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  3. Young v. MacIsaacAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API