Legal Opinion · Dissent

Goon Mee Heung v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided June 29, 1967No. 6828_1Published

1DissentCoffin, Circuit Judge

While conceding that the court’s opinion is both reasonable and supported by authority, I do not think that it is compelled by either the language or the scheme of the statutes. It is, I think, not at all difficult to seize upon a narrower *239meaning of “inspection” without doing violence to either law or policy — in accordance with the rule that deportation statutes should be construed strictly in favor of the alien. Fong Haw Tan v. Phelan, 333 U.S. 6, 10, 68 S.Ct. 374, 92 L.Ed. 433 (1948). See also Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Errico, 385 U.S. 214, 225, 87 S.Ct. 473, 17 L.Ed.2d 318…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Fong Haw Tan v. PhelanSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. ErricoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. United States Ex Rel. Volpe v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  4. United States Ex Rel. Volpe v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1933
  5. Ex Parte SaadiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API