Davis v. Riddle & Associates, P.C.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
LEGROME D. DAVIS, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 22nd day of September 2008, upon consideration of Plaintiffs Motion for Attorney’s Fees (Doc. No. 61), Defendants’ Opposition thereto (Doc. No. 63), and Plaintiffs Reply Brief in Support thereof (Doc. No. 64), it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion is GRANTED.
I. INTRODUCTION
On April 29, 2008, we granted an order preliminarily approving class settlement on this matter. On July 24, 2008, plaintiffs counsel filed a petition seeking $125,000 in total fees and costs pursuant to the fee-shifting provisions of the Fair Debt Collection…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Rode v. DellarcipreteCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Ursic v. Bethlehem MinesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- E.C. v. School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
- M.M. v. School District of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
- FROMPOVICZ v. NIAGARA BOTTLING, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
- KISSINGER v. THE MENNONITE HOMEDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
- OHM SYSTEMS, INC. v. SENERGENE SOLUTIONS, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2025