Legal Opinion

City of East Cleveland v. Palmer

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 11, 1974No. 32938PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJackson, J.

This is an appeal from a conviction and a fine levied for the violation of Section 351.14(a) of the Codified Ordinances of the City of East Cleveland, commonly known as the “overnight parking ban.” Appellant briefs five errors.

In his first assignment of error, appellant claims that “Section 351.14 of the Codified Ordinances of the plaintiff city is unconstitutional and void.” Subsection (a) of Codified Ordinance 351.14 of the City of East Cleveland states:

“Parking more than five hours prohibited.

No vehicle shall park, stop, stand or be permitted to remain on any street in the City longer than…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City of Cleveland v. AntonioOhio Court of Appeals · 1955
  2. Alice Realty, Inc. v. Columbus (City)Ohio Court of Appeals · 1957

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hilton v. City of ToledoOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  2. City of University Heights v. O'LearyOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Spring Lake Hotel & Guest House Ass'n v. Borough of Spring LakeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
  4. City of Crystal Lake v. CunninghamAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API