Legal Opinion

Bayridge Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Department of Revenue

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1995No. OTC 3271; OTC 3272; SC S41163PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraber, J.

This case involves the valuation, for ad valorem tax purposes in the tax year 1990-91, of two apartment complexes — the Durham Park Apartments, located in Tigard, and the Bayridge Apartments, located in Beaverton. The Tax Court found that the true cash value of the Durham Park property was $6,535,000 and that the true cash value of the Bayridge property was $4,412,000. Bayridge Assoc. Ltd. Partnership v. Dept. of Rev., 13 OTR 24, 31 (1994). On de novo review, ORS 305.445, we affirm.

Durham Park Limited Partnership and Bayridge Associates Limited Partnership (taxpayers) receive federal income…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Griffin v. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Tualatin Development Co. v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Bayridge Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 1994

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. SampsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  2. Woda Ivy Glen Ltd. Partnership v. Fayette County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Huron Ridge LP v. Ypsilanti TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Penns Grove Gardens Ltd. v. Penns Grove BoroughNew Jersey Tax Court · 1999
  5. Deerfield 95 Inv. Assoc. v. Town, East Lyme, No. Cv96-0538357 (May 26, 1999)Connecticut Superior Court · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API