Legal Opinion

Norfolk v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 9, 1990No. 56777PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMON, Chief Judge.

Movant, Paul O’Neil Norfolk, appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

Movant was convicted by a jury of second degree burglary in violation of § 569.170 RSMo 1986 for knowingly entering the stock room of a Famous-Barr department store for the purpose of stealing. He was sentenced as a persistent offender to a term of fifteen years imprisonment. His sentence was affirmed on direct appeal in State v. Norfolk, 745 S.W.2d 737 (Mo.App.1987).

Movant filed a pro se motion to vacate, set aside, or correct the judgment and sentence…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Moton v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Johnson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. State v. NorfolkMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. HolmesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API