Legal Opinion

Gray v. Wilson

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 15, 1835PublishedCited by 16 opinions

ERROR to the common pleas of Cumberland county. This was an issue directed by the court of common pleas, in which James Wilson was made plaintiff, and John Gray, Samuel Alexander, Esq. and Jacob Fetter, were defendants. All the points and facts of the case are fully stated in the opinion of the court, which was delivered by

1Opinion of the CourtSergeant, J.

—Certain moneys were brought into the court below, which were the proceeds of the sales of personal property of Jacob G. Cauffman and John Gray, by virtue of executions at the suits of various creditors, on judgments obtained in that court. The sales weremadeon the 13th of February 1834. The plaintiffs claimed a balance due to them, as landlords of Gray (of whom Cauffman became partner), for rent amounting to 764 dollars and 68 cents, and gave notice to that efle.ct to the sheriff on the 11th of February 1834, the goods being on the premises of Cauffman and Gray when seized in execution. The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Woglam v. CowperthwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1790
  2. Dawson v. ShaverIndiana Supreme Court · 1822

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Supreme Council of the Order of Chosen Friends v. ForsingerIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Commercial Union Assurance Co. v. HockingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1887
  3. Union National Bank v. Moline, Milburn & Stoddard Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Rowe v. WilliamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
  5. Mentz v. Armenia Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1875

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API