Legal Opinion

Seibly v. City of Sunnyside

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 27, 1934No. 25121. Department OnePublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

This action was brought to recover the value of household goods and personal effects destroyed by fire, alleged to be due to the negligence of the defendants. The case was tried to the court and a jury, and at the conclusion of the plaintiff’s evidence a nonsuit was granted as. to the defendants Walter Krous and J. A. Krous. The trial proceeded as to the other defendant, the city of Sunnyside, and resulted in a verdict in favor of the plaintiffs in the sum of $1,576.25. Motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and, in the alternative, for a new trial, being interposed and overruled,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hellan v. Supply Laundry Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Sea Ins. v. Vicksburg, S. & P. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1908
  3. New York, Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. New Jersey Electric Railway Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1897
  4. Lloyd v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Bower v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Robillard v. Selah-Moxee Irrigation DistrictWashington Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Michigan Millers Mutual Fire Insurance v. Oregon-Washington Railroad & Navigation Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Thomas v. CaseyWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Arnhold v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API