State v. ORTIZ-RODRIGUEZ
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, J.
Defendant was convicted of 15 counts of unlawful delivery of methamphetamine, ORS 475.890, and (stemming from the same 15 incidents) 15 counts of unlawful possession of methamphetamine, ORS 475.894. On appeal, he advances two assignments of error. In the first, he argues that the trial court committed plain error by admitting a laboratory report without testimony from the criminalist who prepared it. We rejected an indistinguishable claim in State v. Raney, 217 Or App 470, 474, 175 P3d 1024, rev den, 344 Or 671 (2008), decided after defendant’s brief was submitted, and we reach the same…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Outdoor Media Dimensions Inc. v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. WaltonOregon Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. BrakeOregon Supreme Court · 1921
- State v. OatneyOregon Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. RaneyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. EgelandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- State v. LunettaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015