Legal Opinion

Biasi v. Leavitt

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided January 4, 1985No. 14937PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This is a boundary dispute. Appellants, the Biasis, brought an action to eject respondent from a disputed strip of land of which they are the record owners. Respondent Leavitt successfully defended the action, claiming that he had adversely possessed the land for the statutory period. The sole issue on appeal is whether respondent satisfactorily established his compliance with the statutory requirement of NRS 11.150 that a party pay all taxes assessed against the land in question for a period of five years before adverse possession can be established. We conclude that he did not and…

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sorensen v. CostaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Trappett v. DavisIdaho Supreme Court · 1981
  3. McDonald v. FoxNevada Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Stephens v. HurlyMontana Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Platt v. MartinezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by6 opinions

  1. Breliant v. Preferred Equities Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Triplett v. David H. Fulstone Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Paragon Henderson Associates I v. L. Bruce Nybo, Inc. (In Re L. Bruce Nybo, Inc.)District Court, D. Nevada · 2000
  4. Colfer v. HarmonNevada Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Nat'L Gold Mining Corp. Vs. Hygrade Gold Co. Ltd. C/W 78984Nevada Supreme Court · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API